Like the big bad wolves in fairytale lore, wolves are as much a political as environmental issue and, as Katrin Bennhold says, it isn’t just sheep being attacked – non-German residents are facing a backlash

By Katrin Bennhold

Grimm truth: some politicians are comparing wolves to immigrants

They struck at dawn and left a trail of blood and body parts. There were six, maybe seven perpetrators. One had calmly passed Annett Hertweck’s car as she was speeding down the forest path to the scene of the massacre near the eastern village of Forstgen, Germany. Only then did she see the bodies. Dozens of them.

“It was horrific,” she says. The culprits were wolves, descended from Polish forebears. The victims were German sheep, 55 of them. Extinct for the best part of a century, Germany’s most notorious fairytale baddie is back. Wolves have been slipping across the Polish border for years, gradually settling into rural Germany. There are only a few hundred of them.

But to hear some politicians tell it, the country is facing an invasion. And the way they talk about wolves is strikingly similar to how they talk about immigrants, turning the animal into an object of terror – and the discussion into an allegory for the nation’s simmering culture wars. Between urban elites and rural left-behinds. Between west and east. And also between those who welcome wolves – and immigrants – and those who fear them.

There are a lot of parallels between the settlement of wolves in Germany and the refugee crisis

Karsten Hilse

“The wolf polarises, it touches something deep inside of us,” says Hertweck, who runs a biosphere reserve with 500 sheep and describes herself as pro-wolf. “The wolf is the perfect scapegoat for our times,” she adds, cast as a type of criminal foreigner “with teeth instead of knives” that is “protected by the elites”.

In the home of the Brothers Grimm, where the big bad wolf has been the stuff of children’s nightmares for generations, it is now also the stuff of populist election manifestoes.

Refugees settle in Germany

Mohamed Ali Hussein ((L), 19, and his cousin Sinjar Hussein, 34, sweep leaves at a cemetery in Gieshof village, for which they receive a small allowance, near Letschin

When Karsten Hilse, an eastern lawmaker for the anti-immigrant, anti-wolf Alternative for Germany party, or AfD, talks about wolves, it sounds a lot as if he is talking about immigrants. And sometimes he is. “There are a lot of parallels between the settlement of wolves in Germany and the refugee crisis,” Hilse said in a parliamentary debate last year.

The arrival of 1.2 million migrants since 2015 had led to “rapes, murders, attacks on police officers”, he said, and added that most migrants live on German welfare. “The same goes for wolves,” he said, presumably referring to public subsidies for wolf protection measures and compensation for killed farm animals.

Wolves and what to do with them has become a central campaign issue in three hard-fought regional elections in the former communist east this year, where the number of wolves is highest and the far right is strong. Some want to shoot the wolf, seeing a dangerous predator that is a threat not just to lambs but to children and a familiar way of life. Others see the animal as an endangered species that needs protection.

The woman in charge of the wolf issue at the local chapter of the AfD in eastern Saxony is called Silke Grimm, no relation to the Grimm brothers. Silke Grimm has been campaigning in favour of hunting wolves since 2014. “At the time the others laughed at us,” she says. “Now they are copying us.”

In her small office near the Polish and Czech borders, Grimm hands out two pamphlets. One is about Islam and why it is incompatible with German culture. The other is about wolves and why the current number of them is incompatible with Saxony’s “cultural landscape”. Like the “ceiling” the AfD has demanded for the number of asylum seekers Germany can tolerate, the leaflet demands a “ceiling” for wolves. The party also advises children not to be in the forest by themselves. On the cover a wolf is seen trotting through a residential area with its teeth bared, an abandoned teddy bear in the foreground.

“Wolves are dangerous and they breed explosively,” Grimm says. “The official line is it’s all under control. We know that line from the refugee crisis. No one believes a word of it.”

Over the past century, there have been no reported cases of a wolf killing a human in Germany, says Vanessa Ludwig, a biologist at the wolf information office for the regional government. The last known death in western Europe was in Spain in the 1960s. German authorities have counted 73 packs of wolves, 31 wolf couples and three lone wolves across the country – perhaps 700 animals in total.

“There is no wolf crisis,” says Ludwig, who remembers exactly when wolves became political. “It was in 2015, during the refugee crisis,” she says. Since then, “it has been one big emotional storm”.

And as with migrants, when it comes to the wolf, emotions seems to matter more than facts. Everyone in Saxony knows Grimm’s fairytales. And everyone knows the story of Lolek and Bolek: two goats who were kept in the backyard of the nursery in the village of Uhsmannsdorf. One night, a wolf came. First Lolek was gone. Two weeks later, Bolek was gone too. Now the children are no longer taken into the nearby forest.

The local mayor, Heike Böhm, walks in the forest every day. “The story of Lolek and Bolek has reinforced fears that the place is overrun with wolves,” Böhm says. “I have never seen one.”

When chancellor Angela Merkel met with fellow conservatives in the region last year, Lolek and Bolek came up. Merkel said that “where necessary” the wolf should be hunted. Her environment minister is now mulling a law that would make it easier to shoot “problem wolves”.

In the early 19th century, when the Grimm brothers collected their fairytales, wolves presented an existential threat to small farmers in an agrarian society. The wolf was portrayed as the ultimate villain, a scheming predator that goes after women, children and livelihood. In The Wolf and the Seven Young Goats, he gobbles up six of seven baby goats. In Little Red Riding Hood, he swallows first granny, then the little girl.

“You can explain that fairytales are only fairytales but that alone won’t do,” says Ludwig. “The psychology is complex because of the long history of the wolf in German folklore. Little Red Riding Hood syndrome.”

Some aren’t waiting for hunting laws to change. The body of a wolf was found floating in a lake; it had been shot in the head, then sunk in the water with a block of cement tied around its body to weigh it down. Executed, mafia style

As in fairytales, so in politics, the wolf represents more than one thing. Thirty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, wolves have come to embody the resentment some easterners feel about what they experienced as a western takeover. Under communism, wolves that came across the border were shot. After reunification, wolves became a “highly protected species” under European Union rules.

The wolf was seen as a winner of reunification, while some farmers here feel like losers – without much money, lacking status they once had and losing their children to the west. “And now the wolf comes and eats their sheep,” says Hertweck, the witness to the sheep massacre. “I can understand their anger.”

A short drive away, Stephan Kaasche, a nature guide, is running a workshop with 10-year-olds. He pulls out a wolf skull, opens its jaw wide and holds it above one girl’s head. “See?” he says. “The wolf cannot swallow you whole.”

For Kaasche, the current hysteria about wolves “says nothing about wolves and a lot about human nature”.

People’s grievances are real but they have nothing to do with the wolf, he says. Politicians who pretend otherwise are “like a wolf in sheep’s clothing”.

via: Wolves return to Germany – along with anti-immigrant hostilities | The Independent